Katie Swan vs Jaeda Daniel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Jun at 06:42 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Swan vs J. Daniel

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Swan 1 - 0 Daniel
They have played 2 sets in total, with Katie Swan winning 2 and Jaeda Daniel winning 0. The last match between Katie Swan and Jaeda Daniel was at the W35 Decatur, 13-06-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Katie Swan getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Swan | 1 |
| Daniel | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W35 Decatur(06-13-25)
K. Swan vs J. Daniel H2H Profile
K. Swan vs J. Daniel Match Preview:
- Daniel's recent second serve success is 40.3%, slightly trailing Swan, who holds a slim edge at 40.57%.
- On return games, Daniel excels with 50.3% conversion on opponents' second serves compared to Swan's 50%. How significant is this difference? It could tip the scales in Daniel's favor.
- In terms of first serve return, Daniel demonstrates superior performance at 35.5% over Swan's 26.32%, suggesting a potential advantage.
- While under pressure, Swan shows resilience, saving 53.91% of breakpoints versus Daniel's 48.47% success rate in recent matches.
- Overall match wins in the past year favor Swan with a 73.33% success rate, far exceeding Daniel's 46%.
- On preferred surfaces, Daniel achieves 55% wins on Hard courts, whereas Swan shines on I.hard with a 67% win rate.
- When examining playing levels, Swan triumphs in lower-tier events with an 87.5% win rate, while Daniel competes more frequently in challenging tournaments but with a lesser success rate at 47.92%.
- Daniel faces higher-ranked opponents averaging 300.52, whereas Swan faces players ranked on average at 422.33, indicating a disparity in opponent quality.
- If reaching a deciding set, Swan outperforms Daniel significantly, winning 50% to Daniel's 23% in such situations.
- In converting breakpoints, Swan stands ahead with 42.86% effectiveness compared to Daniel's 37.66%.
Editorial Prediction (June 13, 2025, UTC):
Swan emerges as a formidable competitor, showcasing a high match win rate over the last year, particularly on I.hard surfaces where they excel with a 67% success rate.
Despite facing lower-ranked opponents than Daniel, Swan consistently capitalizes on competitive opportunities, converting breakpoints at a higher rate and performing better under pressure.
While Daniel exhibits strengths in specific areas like first serve returns, Swan's superior recent overall performance and ability to perform in deciding sets suggest a slight edge in this upcoming match.
Therefore, given the current statistics and form, Swan is the likely victor in this matchup.
Katie Swan vs Jaeda Daniel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Swan vs J. Daniel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:35:21 | Average Match Time | 1:35:21 |
| 67% (42/63) | 1st Serve % | 56% (20/36) |
| 64% (27/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (10/20) |
| 38% (8/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (5/16) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 22% (2/9) |
| 58% (21/36) | Return Points Win % | 44% (28/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Swan Recent Matches Played
J. Daniel Recent Matches Played

K. Swan vs J. Daniel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.30% (238/144) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.05% (170/163) |
| 62.03% (526/322) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.73% (388/362) |
| 55.31% (4233/3420) | Games Win/Loss | 51.60% (3431/3218) |
| 67.07% (165/81) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.80% (85/73) |
| 40.00% (14/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.70% (75/79) |
| 73.21% (41/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47.62% (10/11) |
| 40.00% (18/27) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1299 | Aces Total | 213 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 1406 | Total Double Faults | 1129 |
| 1:28:51 | Average Match Time | 1:4:5 |
| 503.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 444.15 |
| 59% (12909/21757) | 1st Serve % | 64% (8262/12908) |
| 68% (8742/12909) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (4850/8262) |
| 45% (3971/8856) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (1889/4646) |
| 49% (1363/2806) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (878/1812) |
| 46% (10236/22260) | Return Points Win % | 48% (6266/13080) |
| 37.04% (10/17) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38.46% (10/16) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64.26% (178/99) | Challenger W/L | 46.77% (87/99) |
| 83.33% (35/7) | Futures W/L | 56.46% (83/64) |
| 64% (232/362) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (166/325) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 53% (34/64) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (18/43) |
| 47% (47/101) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (39/90) |
| 86% (243/210) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (173/152) |
| 12% (243/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (173/21) |
| 20% (138/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (160/16) |